A Dog on Death Row

Milo, a dog in need of good luck for a change
Milo, a dog in need of good luck for a change
To some, that may sound melodramatic, but it is an accurate description of Milo’s plight. Milo is a young white German shepherd, just three years old, currently being held at a high-kill shelter in Orlando, Florida. High-kill shelters are overcrowded and under-staffed, and they can offer dogs only a narrow window of opportunity to find new homes and new lives. Milo’s time is running out, for he will be eligible for euthanasia on August 2nd. This doesn’t mean that Milo will automatically be put down on Tuesday, but it does mean that if more dogs come into the shelter and they need room for them, he is likely to be one picked for euthanasia, despite being young, healthy, and friendly. I am in awe of those who work in rescue; I don’t know how they find the strength to persevere, for they get their hearts broken on a daily basis. They cannot save them all, and just as the police do, they get to see the worst of human nature. It is bound to be emotionally and physically exhausting, and yet they keep doing it, one cat or dog at a time. Those who work in horse rescue have an even more daunting challenge, of course. It takes courage and dedication and all of us who love animals should be grateful that they are willing to work on the front lines.
Shadow's Before photo
Shadow
Milo needs a foster home ASAP. Joan, who was Tristan’s Echo angel, can’t take him herself, as she has just started to foster a young female with kennel cough, which she has to keep separate from her own four dogs. Echo does not have any foster homes open at present for Milo. If someone can commit to fostering him, Echo can remove him from the shelter and put him temporarily in a boarding kennel, but only up to a week. And they cannot do that unless they know he’ll have a place waiting for him. I admit that this case hits close to home for me. Milo is three, just like Shadow, and he looks eerily like Shadow; moreover, this is the same high-kill shelter where Tristan was held. Tristan beat the odds, thanks in great measure to Joan, who pulled him on his last day, and to Becky, who offered to foster him, and then to the thirteen wonderful people who volunteered to help get Tristan to his new home, driving him up the East Coast to me, a pilgrimage that my friend Glenne likened to the passing of the Olympic Torch. I very much hope that Milo will be able to beat the odds like Tristan.
Tristan's Before Photo
TristanTristan
Shadow's After Photo
Shadow

As precarious as Milo’s predicament is, he is not even the most endangered dog at the shelter; Joan says there is a seven month old black and tan female there whose time runs out on Saturday. She is just a puppy, and her sad-eyed look is haunting. Here is her photo.
http://apps.ocfl.net/dept/CEsrvcs/animal/NetPets/AnimalDetail.asp?ID=A210090&RT=T
Tristan beat the odds in another way—he was so lucky to be picked up in Orlando County, even though shelter dogs there have a limited opportunity to find new homes. Had he been found in Polk County, where Joan lives, he’d have been doomed from the outset, for Polk County does not adopt out German shepherds, Rotweillers, Dobermans, and pit bulls. They are not offered to the public, are held for five days in case a rescue group is willing to take one, and then are put down, no matter how adoptable they may be. I know that cities like Detroit and Miami do not adopt out pit bulls, which are usually seized in raids on dog fighting rings, for it was believed that these dogs could not be rehabilitated.The Mike Vick pit bulls proved us wrong on that; they were given a rare chance by court order and of the more than fifty dogs taken from his property, only two had to be euthanized. Several have even become therapy dogs.So we ought never to assume that second chances will be wasted—on people or dogs. Sadly, Florida’s many high-kill shelters are not unique; this is a problem in other areas of the country, too, particularly in the South, which is why there are regular caravan runs from these shelters to shelters where the dogs will not automatically be euthanized once their time runs out.
Some of my friends have become volunteers for Echo’s transports in the wake of my adoption of Tristan, and they all say it is remarkably rewarding to know they are helping to give a dog a new home. And by helping these dogs in need, we are helping other people, too, giving joy to those who will adopt them. As I said, this is very personal for me because of my experiences with my three shepherds, all wonderful, smart, loving dogs that could so easily have been euthanized with a little less luck. I am putting up a photo of Milo; I wasn’t able to do so with the young female shepherd whose time is running out, so I just included the link for her. I am also going to post Before and After photos of Shadow and Tristan to show how an abused, neglected animal can thrive in a good home. I am asking all of my fellow dog lovers to post this blog or the information about Milo on your Facebook pages. The more people who know about his peril, the more likely it is that someone may be able to foster him and literally save his life—or the life of the little girl who may doomed to die at seven months of age.
I’ll end this by commenting again upon the enormous admiration I have for those who try to save our society’s throwaway dogs and cats, animals that were once automatically put down. Att least now many of them are given second chances, thanks in great measure to the people who work in rescue, and to those willing to consider adoption. Their efforts remind me of a story I once read, which may or may not be true. A young boy came upon hundreds and hundreds of starfish that had been washed ashore by a high tide and were dying on the sand. He began to pick them up and throw them back into the water. A man passing by stopped to watch and then said, “Why are you bothering to do this? You can’t save them all, so what difference are you making?”The boy returned a starfish to the sea and then said, “It makes a difference to that one.”
If you think you can help, you can contact Joan at jga@catniptrails.com or me at sharonkaypenman@gmail.com.

ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE TOUR–DAY FOUR, POITIERS

Breakfast at the Abbaye Royale Hotel is a wonderful way to start any day, for the restaurant is built around the lazar house cloisters. It is like gazing through a window to the past. So despite our rather bumpy introduction to Fontevrault, we were all very happy to be here. And we were eager to begin the day’s expedition. If Henry had left his heart in Le Mans, Eleanor gave hers to the city we would be visiting today, Poitiers.

Like Le Mans, Poitiers is an ancient city and may have been the capital of the Roman province of Gallia Aquitania in the second century. It was known then as Limonum and boasted two amphitheatres that were as large as the Coliseum in Rome. Sadly, not a trace remains of them, for their ruins were utterly razed in 1857 by very ill-advised city councilors. In the Middle Ages, Poitiers was the center of the dominions ruled by the powerful Dukes of Aquitaine. Eleanor was often here during the course of her long and eventful life and in 1199, she issued a charter bestowing autonomy and communal rights upon the city. We felt Henry’s presence very strongly in Le Mans, were sure that we would find Eleanor in Poitiers.

We were lucky, too, to have a very special guide in Mary McKinney. Mary is an American who has lived in Poitiers for the past ten years, teaching at a local university, and if she weren’t a friend, I’d be stricken with envy, for she has the life I’d love for myself. She gets to hear Mass in Eleanor’s cathedral, to visit castles and abbeys whenever she has a free weekend, and she plans to spend Christmas this year in Carcassonne. It doesn’t get any better than that!

When my friend Valerie and I visited Poitiers in 2009, Mary offered to give us a private tour of Eleanor’s city, and we had so much fun that I was determined our tour group would experience one of Mary’s tours, too. She met us in Poitiers and I am sure she surprised Janus by greeting him in Hungarian. Mary spent time in Hungary on her travels; she has probably racked up more frequent flyer miles than Marco Polo, assuming they had them in the 14th century, of course.

For me, the high point of Mary’s tour was the Palais de Justice, the great hall of the palace of the Dukes of Aquitaine. Eleanor’s notorious grandfather, William IX, added a donjon in 1104 and named it after his equally notorious mistress, the aptly named Dangereuse, wife of a neighboring lord, the Viscount of Chatellerault. When he moved Dangereuse into the palace, that was the last straw for his long-suffering wife and she took up residence at Fontevrault Abbey, where she must have had some interesting conversations with her husband’s first wife, a frequent guest. William then added insult to injury by wedding his son to Dangereuse’s daughter; the result of this unlikely union was our Eleanor. In Saints, I have a scene where Henry and Eleanor share their family histories on their wedding night, in between lovemaking. It is not easy to impress a man who can claim the Demon Countess of Anjou as one of his ancestors, but Eleanor manages it with her stories about her grandsire. Henry finds it hilarious that “your grandfather was having an affair with his son’s mother-in-law,” and points out gleefully that “between the two of us, we’ve got a family tree rooted in Hell!”

So the palace must have seen some truly fascinating scenes during those years that the Dukes of Aquitaine reigned over Poitiers. We owe the stunningly beautiful great hall to Eleanor. Today it is known as the Palais de Justice, but in Eleanor’s time, it was called La Salle des Pas Perdus, the “hall of lost footsteps,” for it was huge, one of the largest halls in Europe, 160 feet in length, 55 feet in width. The original beamed ceiling has been replaced, but the splendor remains. Eleanor often held court here and the hall must have resounded with the music of the finest troubadours in Christendom. It was also here that Joan of Arc was subjected to an intense three week interrogation by the Archbishop of Reims in 1429; the churchmen concluded that the king might lawfully receive this “simple shepherd-maiden” for “there was nothing found in her which was not Catholic and reasonable.”

The city ramparts are ancient, too. The first set dates back to Roman times and the second set was ordered and funded by Eleanor. And the city’s main street, the Grand Rue, once echoed with the footsteps of Roman legionnaires, then the pageantry of its medieval dukes—and one unforgettable duchess. The churches of Poitiers are memorable, too. The cathedral of St Pierre was begun in 1162 by Henry and Eleanor, the older cathedral razed to make way for the new one; it was in the older cathedral that Henry and Eleanor were wed on May 18, 1152. The magnificent stained glass Crucifixion Window is said to have been donated by Henry and Eleanor, and they are portrayed in the bottom panel of the window. So our visit to the cathedral was special to all of us.

The church of Notre Dame la Grand is truly superb. It was first mentioned in 924 AD and was rebuilt in the second half of the 12th century. The west front of the church is one of the finest Romanesque facades in France, looking as it did when Eleanor attended Mass there. When I was here in 2009, Mary was telling me about an eagle etched into a window in appreciation for Eleanor’s generosity to the church. She’d never been able to find it, she said, despite numerous attempts to locate it. The words were no sooner out of her mouth than we both happened to glance upward and, lo and behold, there was Eleanor’s eagle. When we first arrived at Notre Dame la Grand, a Mass was in progress; imagine what it would be like to attend services in a church more than eight centuries old. Most of us missed seeing another beautiful church, for we were pressed for time, the abbey church of St Hilaire, a stop on the pilgrim route to San Juan de Compostella. Built in the 11th century over a Roman cemetery, St Hilaire was the site for the funeral and burial in March, 1168 of Patrick, Earl of Salisbury, uncle of the celebrated William Marshal, slain when Eleanor was ambushed by the de Lusignans. And in June of 1172, Eleanor’s son Richard was consecrated as Count of Poitou and Duke of Aquitaine here.

We left Eleanor’s city with reluctance and headed back to the abbey that became her home in the years after Richard’s death. On the way, we stopped for a wine-tasting at a local winery; Chinon is famous for its red wines. We got back to the hotel in time to visit the abbey bookstore, where we discovered that they were selling some of my novels. I was pleased, of course, for they didn’t offer that many English language books, but at least this time I did not give out an excited and undignified squeal the way I did when I was there in 2006 and found one of my novels on their shelves.

J.D. had made dinner reservations for us at the restaurants in Fontevrault, sparing us the need for another emergency run to the McDonalds in Saumur. Some of us dined at the Plantagenet, more of us at La Licorne, the Unicorn. It is remarkable that such a small village would have a restaurant as exceptional as this one. But then, this is France. Afterward, we walked back to the hotel as a misting rain began to fall and got ready for our night tour of the abbey. Stay tuned for that.

ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE TOUR–NIGHT THREE, OUR ARRIVAL AT FONTEVRAULT

I pick up the story on Wednesday, June 8th, in early evening. After a delightful afternoon in Le Mans, a wonderful place for communing with our Angevin ghosts, we headed for Fontevrault Abbey; by the way, I use the older spelling instead of the more modern Fontevraud for consistency, as this is what I’ve used since Here Be Dragons. But we were to encounter an unexpected obstacle on the way.

As we approached the Pont de Varennes sur Loire, the bridge spanning the River Loire, it became apparent at once that we had a problem. This was a very narrow bridge and there was no way our large tour bus would be able to stay in its own lane. There was no other route to Fontevrault, though. I’ve always been in awe at the driving skills of those who handle these huge buses; it sometimes seems as if they are trying to get that camel through the needle’s eye, and amazingly enough, they usually do. I’ve encountered tour buses on Welsh mountain roads with my heart in my mouth. Once I saw two behemoth buses trying to squeeze around each other on Aberglasyn Pass; it was like a mating dance of dinosaurs. So I’ve had experience with big buses and narrow roads. But I was not prepared for what happened next.

Fortunately, traffic was very light and once the bridge was clear of other cars, our intrepid guide, J.D., got out to lead us to the promised land, and Janus, our equally intrepid bus driver, began to edge out onto the bridge. It was then that we learned France has its fair share of crazy drivers, for a woman drove onto the other end of the bridge and headed right for us. Now if she failed to notice a six ton bus, she must have had a seeing-eye dog as her co-pilot. But on she came. Meanwhile, several other death-defying drivers seemed about to follow her out onto the bridge. J.D. ran over to her car, explaining politely that she really had to back up since we couldn’t. She was having none of that, though. I wouldn’t have objected had J.D. commandeered her car and backed it up himself, but I guess he didn’t want to see the inside of a French jail. So Janus took up the gauntlet Crazy Lady had thrown down and we began to creep across the bridge, with J.D. doing his best to keep our tour from ending up in the Loire. Thanks to Janus’s remarkable driving skills — and maybe a little help from Eleanor — we managed to squeeze by Crazy Lady’s car without making contact, and the other kamikaze drivers had thought better of it and backed up. As for me, I can only marvel that some people can apparently drive without ever activating their brains. Forget that old cliché about ignoring the elephant in the living room. From now on, I’ll be thinking of the bus on the bridge.

When we reached Fontevrault, Janus must have sworn under his breath at sight of the village. In the Middle Ages, village streets were not designed to accommodate modern tour buses. Janus had to maneuver us along streets that reminded me of a scene in Prince of Darkness, where Justin is caught in an alley that was a sword’s length in width. It was not quite that bad in Fontevrault, but Janus needed nerves of steel and eyes in the back of his head. Eventually we made it to the abbey and J.D. had to ask for admittance at the gate, just as he would have done in the Middle Ages. Well, aside from using an inter-com, of course.

The Abbaye Royale de Fontevraud is one of my favorite hotels, located in the abbey lazar house, or leper hospital. The last time I stayed there, I loved the intimacy, for hotel guests had the free run of the abbey after the other tourists were kicked out. So I felt as if I were coming home — only this turned out to be a home in which the cupboards were bare. The hotel’s restaurant is renowned for its cuisine, and I’d anticipated our group having dinner there. I was truly taken aback when we learned they were fully booked and could accommodate only five people. I’m a bit embarrassed to admit I was one of the five, but we assumed the rest of our group would be able to get dinner in the restaurants in Fontevrault. We were wrong.

While the Lucky Five were enjoying a wonderful dinner, our friends were wandering the village in search of sustenance. Some of them were able to get into the last seating at the Plantagenet, but the other restaurants in Fontevrault were closed. It wasn’t that late, but once you are out in the French countryside, you soon find that village life is not like the Las Vegas Strip. Our flock couldn’t have had a better shepherd than J.D. and he arranged for Janus to drive fifteen of the group to Saumur, which is about 20 minutes away. Saumur is not a village like Fontevrault, has a population of over 25,000. But apparently they are larks, not owls, for all of their restaurants were closed by the time our group arrived. Well, there was one place still open, a McDonalds, so they could stave off starvation. But on the way back, they took a wrong turn; the roads in rural France are almost as pitch-black as mountain roads in Wales. They soon found themselves at a dead end, on a very narrow road, with ditches on each side of the bus. Janus is an excellent driver and got everyone safely back to our hotel, but the next time he is asked to leave Hungary for a job in France, he may well head for the hills, and who could blame him?

I’d never encountered a problem like this at the hotel, but I was there in the off-season. This was June and there just wasn’t room at the inn. Nor could we have made reservations in advance, not knowing when we’d be arriving. Their attitude did seem somewhat rigid to me, though, for they must have known that the local restaurants were closing. Couldn’t something have been done for thirty-nine hungry pilgrims? We’d have been happy with fruit and cheese and bread! Had Eleanor and her entourage arrived at the abbey in the middle of the night, they’d never have been turned away. So there is a drawback to democracy, after all. I’d still go back to the Abbaye Royale. Only if I came again in high season, I think I’d be sure to pack some snacks.

Next day we will be visiting Eleanor’s capital city, Poitiers, then after a stop at a winery, we will return to Fontevrault for a night tour of the abbey.

July 14, 2011

ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE TOUR–DAY THREE, MONT ST MICHEL AND LE MANS

We arrived at Mont St Michel on Tuesday evening, still early enough to do a little shopping before our dinner at La Mere Poulard. The main street is crammed with small shops, all selling trinkets and souvenirs and any item you could possibly want stamped with the name Mont St Michel. Some people might have thought the scene was tawdry or tacky. Not us, for we knew how very medieval it was. In the Middle Ages, the same row of shops fronted the main street; only then they were selling pilgrim badges instead of post cards. Medieval merchants depended upon the flow of pilgrims just as the modern ones depend upon the crush of tourists. Human nature has not changed over the centuries and we all want mementos. It is just that in the MA, they came in the shape of scallop shells (San Juan de Compostela), badges depicting St Michael slaying the dragon (Mont St Michel) leaden images of the Blessed Mother Mary (Our Lady of Rocamadour) and little vials of the blood of the holy martyr, St Thomas of Canterbury. In Devil’s Brood, Henry cannot resist a snarky comment that it was almost a miracle in itself that Thomas bled enough to keep filling the little tin phials that the monks gave to pilgrims who made offerings at his shrine. But pilgrim badges were an important element of the medieval economy. In the late 14th century, the citizens of Mont St Michel petitioned the French king, complaining that the tax imposed on the sale of pilgrim souvenirs was hurting their livelihoods; the king, who was devoted to St Michael, agreed to exempt Mont St Michel pilgrim badges from taxation in perpetuity. I suspect, though, that today’s merchants on Mont St Michel are not so lucky.

So after hitting the shops, we returned to our hotel, La Mere Poulard, which has been renowned since the 19th century. I’d never stayed there before because I knew none of the island hotels had ascenseurs, lifts, or elevators, and in the interest of self-preservation, I’d chosen to stay at the Hotel Le Relais St Michel at the head of the causeway, which is a bit pricey but offers truly spectacular views of the abbey from the hotel balconies. I thought it was a good idea to book us into La Mere Poulard, though, for I knew our tour group would enjoy the medieval ambiance after all the other tourists had gone home. So for my readers planning to make pilgrimages of your own to Mont St Michel, pick one of the island hotels if you want to be able to wander about after dark. But unless you are as agile as a mountain goat or travel with only a toothbrush since cars are forbidden, it might be best to go with one of the hotels clustered by the causeway.

We had a private dinner that night in the hotel restaurant, and it was so much fun. We really had a good group, and friendships were already being forged that will last long after our memories of the tour start to fade. The food was excellent, with just one disappointment — the Flaming Dessert of Doom, as one of us called it. This was the house speciality, an omelette that actually resembles a soufflé and is cooked over an open fire. It was certainly entertaining to watch its preparation. The result, though, did not live up to the pyrotechnics or to its renowned reputation — at least for most of us. A few dissenters enjoyed it, Paula being one. Being a vegetarian, though, she was probably grateful for any food she could actually eat; French chefs didn’t seem all that interested in offering up tasty alternatives for non-meat eating guests.

The next morning I disregarded my inner warning voice and went for a walk along the steep medieval street. This entailed tackling way too many stairs and by the time we were ready to head out for our tour of the abbey, I was not only in considerable pain again but I was out of breath, too, which alarmed my doctor friend, John. Fortunately, the travel agency had hired a local guide for the abbey visit. So, knowing I would not be able to manage the 900 plus steps without a pair of wings, I sensibly elected to wait for them at the hotel, making use of Motrin and my support pillow. I’d bought a lumbar pillow especially for the trip and it had been very useful on the flight over, but it somehow disappeared between the airport and our Paris hotel. I’d asked J.D., our guide, if he could pick up another one for me and he found a perfectly-sized little pillow that would prove to be a godsend on our bus rides. I mention it because the pillow will figure in the story later on; consider this a clue.

For an abbey, Mont St Michel has a surprising amount of violence in its history. After Philippe Capet took Normandy from John, his Breton allies lay siege to the island, and the town and part of the abbey itself went up in flames. It would be caught up in the One Hundred Years’ War, too, and in 1424, it was once again besieged, this time by the English, and was saved by the Bretons. The French monarch known as the Universal Spider, Louis XI, created the Order of the Knights of Saint Michael, with the Archangel as its first member. Louis also created an appalling punishment for those poor souls who fell out of favor — a wood and metal cage suspended from the ceiling at the Mont; each time the prisoner inside moved, the whole cage would rock wildly. Political prisoners would be sent here in years to come, truly a fate worse than death for many. But ironically, it would be prisoners who saved the abbey from what befell so many other medieval treasures. By the eighteenth century, the buildings were falling into ruin. It is likely it would have suffered the fate of so many castles and abbeys, torn apart by local people in search of building material, had it not been converted into a prison, the “Sea Bastille.” But in the 19th century, people began to realize the importance of the abbey’s past, and in 1874, it was declared a historic monument — for which countless visitors are eternally grateful.

I had time to ponder the history of Mont St Michel during the two hours that the rest of the tour was getting a guided tour of the abbey. Not all of our guides were first-rate; that is the luck of the draw, after all. This one was very good and they told me she brought the past to vivid life for them. I am just sorry the did not get to see Notre Dame Sous Terre, one of the oldest parts of the abbey, an 11th century church where I committed a murder in Prince of Darkness.

As the abbey’s dramatic silhouette slowly faded into the distance, we sped toward our next destination. Le Mans is an ancient city, founded during the reign of the Emperor Augustus around 20 BC, known as Vindinium; its Roman walls are among the best preserved in Europe. To many people today, Le Mans means the Grand Prix. To me and my fellow medieval geeks, it means the city that Henry II most loved, a city that was the beating heart of the Angevin Empire. Henry was born here, christened here, came here often during his long reign, and suffered his greatest defeat here, when he was forced to flee the city before the forces of his son Richard and the French king. The chroniclers reported that he reined in on the crest of a hill and, as he looked back at the burning city, his anguish gave way to a wild, unholy rage. To the horror of his companions, he vowed that since God had taken from him the city where he was born and where his father was buried, he would deny the Almighty his soul.

We had a wonderful guide at Le Mans and she gave us a fascinating tour of the magnificent cathedral of St Julien and the medieval part of the town, known as Cite Plantagenet. La Cathedrale St Julien is one of the most beautiful churches I’ve ever seen. There was a church on this site since the 5th century; the present cathedral was begun in the 11th century, consecrated in 1120. It has a Romanesque nave and a High Gothic Choir, and a collection of stained glass that only Chartres can rival. Above all, it resonates with the history of the Angevin dynasty. Henry’s parents were wed here in June of 1128. Henry was born in the palace, christened here in the cathedral, as were his brothers. Geoffrey was buried here. Henry was a generous patron of the cathedral, paying for the amazing flying buttresses, and as we gazed upon the spectacular stained glass Ascension window, we knew that Henry had often gazed upon it, too.

Our walk through the Cite Plantagenet was an absolute delight — cobbled streets and half-timbered houses, more than a hundred of them. Le Mans has begun to restore the original colors of these medieval houses, vivid reds, greens, and blues. People don’t always realize how colorful the Middle Ages were. Seven of these houses are decorated with bright corner pillars, one way of identifying locations, for all streets did not have names and none had numbers; if directions referred to the “red pillared house,” the inhabitants had a point of reference — rather clever, actually.

In Henry’s time, there were two royal residences in Le Mans, the ancient castle near the cathedral and the palace in the Place St Pierre, where he had been born and where he and Eleanor stayed upon their visits to the city. The palace would also be home for Richard Coeur de Lion’s queen, Berengaria. She was his wife for just eight years; she would be his widow for thirty. Richard had generously provided for her with dower lands in Normandy and England, but they were not to pass to her until after Eleanor died. In the years after Richard’s death, Berengaria lived at Beaufort en Vallee, Chinon, and Fontevrault, as she struggled to get John to honor her dower payments. He treated her very shabbily, and there is no evidence Eleanor ever intervened on her daughter-in-law’s behalf. Berengaria was treated more fairly by the French king, a man not known for his generosity of spirit. But in 1204. Philippe bestowed the city of Le Mans upon her in return for her surrender of lands, including Falaise and Domfront, which had passed to her upon Eleanor’s death. Le Mans would be her home for the remainder of her life, and she became known as The Lady of Le Mans. She devoted herself to works of charity, and founded the Cistercian abbey of L’Epau near Le Mans; here she was buried after her death in December, 1230. I was very pleased to find that she has not been forgotten in her adopted city; there is a street named Rue de la Reine Berengere, and her name graces a local museum, too. Berengaria is a name she would never have heard; she was born Berenguela, and that was translated into the French Berengere at the time of her marriage; Berengaria is the English version and — to me — nowhere near as pleasing to the ear as the musical Berenguela. As for the palace itself, it has been used since 1790 as the City Hall, and all that remains of the original building are the walls and the walled Roman windows.

I’d planned to end this blog with our arrival that evening at Fontevrault Abbey, but it is getting too long. So I am going to stop here, leaving us in the lovely city of Le Mans, so dear to Henry’s heart. Next — our arrival at Fontevrault, and our excursions to the capital of Eleanor’s domains, a local winery, and then a night tour of the abbey.

 July 10, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE TOUR–DAY TWO FALAISE AND MONT ST MICHEL

We got a late start leaving Paris and it was afternoon by the time we were approaching Falaise. Its castle was a very important stronghold in Henry’s time. Today the town is small — about eight thousand inhabitants — and, as we found out the hard way, it shuts down so its residents can enjoy a long, leisurely lunch. I was surprised, for the castle is a popular tourist attraction, and this was June, after all, hardly the off season. But all of the appealing little restaurants we found were closed. I’m glad the citizens of Falaise have such an unhurried, laidback life style, but it can be challenging for hungry tourists. We eventually found a small market open and had a picnic lunch on the tables of an outdoor café before going up to the castle.

Falaise means “cliff” in French and it is well named, for the fortress is perched on a crag above the town. The current castle was begun in 1123, constructed by King Henry I on the site of an earlier one. It was in that older stronghold that William the Conqueror was born. He was known during his lifetime as William the Bastard, for his parents never wed. The most popular legend has it that his father, Robert, Duke of Normandy, was standing at a tower window and saw a beautiful girl in the village below. The droit de seigneur that supposedly allowed a lord to claim a bride on her wedding night is a myth, but lords did enjoy other rights and Robert exercised one of them by sending for her; in his defense, he was only about seventeen. The young woman, whose name was Herlive or Arlette, refused to be spirited in the back way, though, and, dressed in her finest clothes, rode proudly in by the front gate. Tradition says that she was a humble tanner’s daughter, but historians are skeptical of this, for she would later marry well and tanners were on the lower level of medieval society. Whatever the truth of her back-ground or her first meeting with the Duke of Normandy, she became his mistress and gave birth to William circa 1028. thus changing the course of history.

Falaise was one of our Henry’s most important strongholds and he was often here. He chose Falaise for his triumphant peace treaty in 1174 with the captive King of Scots, and he and Eleanor held at least one lavish Christmas court here. We do not know where Eleanor was held after she had the bad luck to fall into Henry’s hands in November of 1173; Henry kept her location a closely guarded secret. She was most likely confined for a time at Chinon, but it is my belief that she was eventually taken to Falaise. Henry kept his Christmas court at Caen in 1173, and Falaise was just twenty miles to the south, very convenient for a long overdue reckoning with his rebel queen. Moreover, Falaise would have been a safer choice than Chinon, which was too close to Eleanor’s own lands, and if she were being held at Falaise, it would have been easy to bring her to Barfleur when she and Henry and his court sailed for England in the summer of 1174.

The Lower Keep was built by Henry, with contributions by Richard and John. All of Normandy came under Philippe Capet’s control in 1204 and he modified the castle, building the cylindrical structure known as the Talbot Tower. The city and castle suffered under a lengthy siege by Henry V in 1417-1418, and another one during France’s Wars of Religion, when its once formidable walls could not withstand the barrage of cannonballs. The castle and town were badly damaged in World War II, although the two keeps were miraculously spared. But in 1980 a restoration project was launched in accordance with the guidelines of UNESCO, and both keeps are now open to the public.

What I found most interesting at Falaise was an audio station allowing us to listen to the haunting song, Ja Nus Hons Pris, written by Richard Coeur de Lion while held captive by the Holy Roman Emperor. It is a prisoner’s lament, and interestingly, was addressed to his half-sister, Marie, Countess of Champagne. You can hear it on Youtube at http://wn.com/Ja_Nus_Hons_Pris_ENGLISH_VERSION sung by Owain Phyfe. On the play-list on the right side of the screen, the first two songs are the ones I’d recommend, both sung in French. The first one includes a commentary that is not strictly accurate, but it is amusing to hear Eleanor described as Richard’s “mom.” The second song does not offer a commentary. The third is in English, but the acoustics are bad and it is not easy to hear. A full translation can be found in John Gillingham’s Richard I, pages 242-243. I did find one on-line, but the translation is not that good; for example, when Richard complains about his overlord (Philippe) ravaging his lands, it is translated as “father.” Here is the first verse:

Feeble the words and faltering the tongue

Wherewith a prisoner moans his doleful plight;

Yet for his comfort he may make a song.

Friends have I many, but their gifts are slight;

Shame to them if unransomed I, poor wight,

Two winters languish here.

After our visit to the castle at Falaise, we headed for the abbey at Mont St Michel. Eleanor’s connection to the abbey are somewhat tenuous, for it is more closely associated with Henry. He is known to have visited it and even brought Eleanor’s husband Louis along on an unlikely male bonding expedition in 1158. He may well have visited it again in 1172 after doing penance for Becket’s murder just across the bay at Avranches. The abbot, Robert de Torigny, was a good friend of Henry’s and was even accorded the honor of acting as godfather to Henry and Eleanor’s daughter, her namesake who would later become Queen of Castile. But even if Mont St Michel could not be tied to Henry or Eleanor, I think I would have tried to include it on the itinerary anyway, for it is truly one of the most spectacular sites in the western world.

In 708 AD, the Bishop of Avranches had a dream in which the Archangel Michael commanded him to build a sanctuary on Monte Tombe, an island in the nearby bay. He installed a community of monks there in 709 and gave it a new name, Mont St Michel. Pilgrims were soon trudging across the bay at low tide, calling themselves Miquelots, and by the time of our Henry and Eleanor, it was a very important pilgrimage site. It was also a very dangerous one, for the tide came in faster than a galloping horse, at more than 200 feet a minute, and pilgrims also had to contend with sudden sea mists and quicksand. Today that is no longer true; in fact the bay had become so silted that there were fears the island might one day be part of the mainland again. The result was Projet Mont-Saint-Michel, with plans to build a hydraulic dam and replace the causeway with an elevated light bridge; it is supposed to be completed in 2012.

The first sight of Mont St Michel is truly awe-inspiring; I am convinced I heard a collective catch of breath as our tour bus started out onto the causeway. I hope it won’t seem too prideful to quote from my own books, but I cannot improve upon these descriptions. The first is from Devil’s Brood. Henry has come to Avranches to atone for Becket’s murder, a phone-it-in penalty as opposed to the deadly serious penance he would later perform in Canterbury.

From the castle battlements, Henry had a superb view of the bay and, in the distance, the celebrated abbey of Mont St Michel. It was one of the marvels of Christendom, built upon a small, rocky island that was entirely cut off from the mainland at high tide. It had a dreamlike appearance, seeming to rise out of the sand and sea foam like a lost vision of God’s Kingdom, its high, precarious perch above the waves so spectacular and dramatic that at first glimpse, pilgrims did not see how it could have been the work of mortal men.

Here are two more images of Mont St Michel, both from Prince of Darkness. Brother Andrev is a monk at the abbey’s cell in Genets. As he stands on the beach and looks across the bay, this is what he sees.

As always, his gaze was drawn to the shimmering silhouette of Mont St Michel. Crowned by clouds and besieged by foam-crested waves, the abbey isle seemed to be floating above the surface of the bay, more illusion than reality, Eden before the Fall.

 And now it is Justin de Quincy’s turn.

They reached Mont St Michel as the late-afternoon shadows were lengthening. In spite of his fear for Arzhela, Justin was awestruck at sight of the abbey. At first glance, it looked to be a castle carved from the very rocks of the isle, its towering spires reaching halfway to Heaven, the last bastion of Christian faith in a world of denial and disbelief. A fragment of religious lore came back to him, that St Michael was known as the guardian of the threshold between life and eternity, and that seemed the perfect description for his abbey, too, a bridge between the land of the living and the sea of the dead.

I was planning to relate our arrival at Mont St Michel and our first night at Mere Poulard, a celebrated hotel dating from the 19th century. But I think that can wait until the next blog since this one is already approaching novella length. Instead I will close with Justin’s desperate dash across the bay as the tide comes thundering in. He is well aware of the danger, but he is attempting to prevent a murder from occurring at the abbey.

The wind was cold and wet and carried the scent of seaweed and salt. The muted roar of the unseen sea echoed in Justin’s ears, as rhythmic as a heartbeat. Seagulls screeched overhead, their shrill cries eerily plaintive. His stallion had an odd gait, picking up its hooves so high that it was obviously not comfortable with the footing. One of the tavern customers had told Justin that walking on the sand was like treading upon a tightly stretched drum; he very much hoped that he’d not have the opportunity to test that observation for himself. Behind him, he could hear Durand cursing. Justin kept his eyes upon the glow of their guide’s swaying lantern, doing his best to convince himself that, as St Michael led Christian souls into the holy light, so would this Norman youth lead them to safety upon the shore.

Justin does outrun the tides, but sadly, he is too late to stop the murder. Tomorrow: Mont St Michel, Le Mans, and Fontevrault Abbey. 

July 5, 2011

 

 

ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE TOUR–DAY ONE, PARIS

Day One of the tour began with a visit to my favorite cathedral, Notre Dame de Paris. The first stone was laid in 1163, under the supervision of the Bishop of Paris, Maurice Sully, and the consecration of the high altar in the choir was done in 1182. It would become one of the gems of the new style that we know today as Gothic. But if it was not begun until Eleanor had been long gone from Paris, what is its Angevin connection? A very strong one, actually, for it was here that Eleanor and Henry’s son Geoffrey, Duke of Brittany, was given a state funeral after being mortally wounded in a tournament in August of 1186. In past blogs, I’ve mentioned a friend, Malcolm Craig, who is very knowledgeable about Geoffrey’s life; Geoffrey was the subject of his senior thesis at Harvard and Malcolm subsequently published an article, A Second Daughter for Geoffrey of Brittany, in the Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, which was of great value to me during my writing of Devil’s Brood. Malcolm allowed me to post his article, called Proving Matilda, on my blog in January, 2010. It was from Malcolm that I learned there is a plaque in Notre Dame commemorating Geoffrey’s death. I’d never seen it on past visits, so we were determined to find it this time. Soon there were 36 tour members in the hunt, and we did locate it, thanks to Malcolm’s guidance. The date was wrong, 1185, but that is not so unusual; George of Clarence’s tomb has the wrong death date, too, in the chapel of St George at Windsor Castle. Before we left, I did what I always do at Notre Dame and lit a candle for Geoffrey.

We had two Paris guides, Jennifer and Herve. After pointing out the oldest tree in Paris, which dates from 1602, making it older than my own country, our guides took us to the Cluny Museum, which has a magnificent medieval collection, not surprising since its official name is Musee National du Moyen Age. The building itself is breathtaking, at least to me and my fellow medieval geeks. It was formerly the Paris residence of the abbots of Cluny, and the present structure was rebuilt in the late 15th century. For us, probably the most interesting occupant was Mary Tudor, Henry VIII’s sister, who’d been wed at 18 to the much older French king, Louis XII. He died only three months after their marriage, and the young widow took up residence at Cluny until the new French king could be sure she was not pregnant. She had agreed to wed the French king only upon condition that she could choose her second husband herself, but naturally brother Henry reneged on his promise and sent Charles Brandon to fetch her back to England. Instead Mary and Brandon were wed in the chapel at Cluny. Henry was infuriated, but he eventually accepted the marriage after exacting a huge fine from the guilty lovers.

Kings did not like it when their daughters and sisters showed they had minds of their own. While Henry III reluctantly allowed Simon de Montfort to wed his sister Nell, he nursed a grudge that would later explode into a public accusation that Simon had seduced Nell and Simon and Nell had to flee to France for a time. When Edward I’s spirited daughter Joanna dared to marry a squire after the death of her husband, the Earl of Gloucester, the enraged Edward imprisoned the bridegroom at Bristol Castle, and there is a wonderful entry in the Pipe Rolls listing the costs of repairing the royal crown, “which it pleased the lord king to throw into the fire.” In time, Edward recognized the marriage, although there is some evidence that he never really forgave them. And of course we know the outraged reaction of Louis VII, upon learning that his ex-wife Eleanor had not waited for him to arrange a second marriage to a puppet of the French Crown, but instead had dared to wed the young Duke of Normandy, Henry Fitz Empress.

Sorry for the digression, but there is something romantic about Mary’s secret marriage in Cluny Chapel, even if she is a Tudor! Cluny has been a public museum since the 19th century and has on display some of the most amazing tapestries I’ve ever seen, six panels known as The Lady and the Unicorn. They were woven in Flanders in the 15th century, and were rediscovered in the 19th century at Boussac Castle. I was fascinated to learn that the novelist George Sand used her celebrity status to focus attention upon the importance of this find, so in addition to her novels, she leaves another legacy. Tracy Chevalier has written about the creation of these magnificent tapestries in her novel, The Lady and the Unicorn.

After our visit to the Cluny we headed for the Louvre, which began life as a castle constructed by Richard Lionheart’s nemesis, Philippe Auguste; parts of the original wall have been preserved, but the building itself, of course, has been transformed over the centuries. It has been a museum since the late 18th century. Our major objective was to see the beautiful pear-shaped rock crystal vase that was given by Eleanor to Louis after their marriage in 1137. Louis later gave it to his trusted adviser, Abbot Suger, who displayed it proudly in the treasury of his abbey at Saint Denis. George Beech, author of “The Eleanor of Aquitaine Vase” in Eleanor of Aquitaine, Lord and Lady, my favorite book about our duchess, makes a convincing case that the vase was a gift from the Muslim king of the Spanish city of Saragossa to Eleanor’s grandfather, Duke William IX in 1120 and that it is of truly ancient origin, possibly crafted in Persia before the 7th century. There is an intimacy about this vase, perhaps because we know Eleanor held it, caressed it, and cherished it enough to give as a wedding gift, and the inscription by Abbot Suger brings us even closer to the “Queen of Aquitaine,” as he calls her, the “newly wed bride on their first voyage.” It is interesting, too, that Abbot Suger chose to name her as “Aanor,” for in her charters, she always called herself Alienor. I’d tried to convince my publisher to let me use this spelling for my Angevin trilogy, but to no avail. I hope Elizabeth Chadwick has better luck than I did!

It was believed until recently that Eleanor was 15 at the time of her marriage to Louis, but now, thanks to the research of Andrew W. Lewis, we know she was actually born in 1124, and was therefore only 13 when she became Louis’s bride and, several months, later, Queen of France. A very young age for a girl to — in a matter of months — lose her father, gain a husband, and leave her beloved homeland of Aquitaine for a new life in Paris. I think it is typical of Eleanor that over eight centuries after her death, she is still surprising us.

We naturally spent a lot of time admiring Eleanor’s vase, and many in our group wanted to take photos of me beside it; I couldn’t help noticing the puzzled expressions of other museum-goers, clearly wondering why I was the center of so much attention! Soon afterward, though, my day took a turn for the worse. Up until now, my back pain had been easily tolerable, thanks to a back brace and Motrin, but it suddenly flared up without warning. I soldiered on, but fortunately for me, our “resident physician” had a sharp eye and soon realized I was in considerable pain. John persuaded me to sit down and then found our guide to explain that I would not be able to continue with the rest of the museum tour. I am very glad that I had enough common sense to listen to him, for I think I may have jeopardized the rest of the tour had I not paid heed to what my body was telling me. By the time the others rejoined us several hours later, I was starting to feel somewhat better and I’d learned a valuable lesson—that I must pace myself for the remainder of the trip. (For those who are new visitors to my blog or Facebook page, I took a bad fall in March and as a result, I was coping with a herniated disk and a pinched nerve. Thankfully, I have a wonderful chiropractor, or otherwise I’d be making regular pilgrimages to Lourdes.)

That evening, Academic Travel had arranged a medieval-style dinner at the request of several tour members. I’ve attended two medieval banquets in the past, both in York, and in all honesty, this was not in their class, for they’d been the “real deal,” with costumes, medieval music, a medieval menu, etc. But our travel agency did the best they could with so little time to prepare and found a restaurant that specialized in “event” dinners. The food was excellent, as was the wine, of course; we were in France, after all. So even if we were not wearing veils and wimples and tunics, we had a good time, a private room, and not an accordion player in sight!

Afterward, a few brave souls decided to return to Notre Dame to see if they could climb to the top of the tower. I went back to our hotel, where my netbook showed it is a true cousin of Demon Spawn and would not let me log onto the Internet. That was bad enough, but then my new Kindle froze up; I am surprised you all did not hear a primal scream echoing across the Atlantic. Clearly I bring my own “dead zone” with me wherever I go.

I’d been surprised to discover that I had a dazzling view of the Eiffel Tower from my 6th floor window. I was surprised because I always stay at Left Bank hotels, as close as I can get to Notre Dame, and this was the first time that I’d even gotten a glimpse of the Eiffel Tower from a hotel room. Never having been there after dark, I hadn’t realized it is lit up at night, rather like an ironclad Christmas tree. A storm soon broke over the city and the Eiffel Tower disappeared as if by magic in a torrential downpour. Slugabeds like me stayed safely dry, but a few of us did get drenched on the way back to the hotel. The last sight I remember that night was the return of the Eiffel Tower, gleaming through the mist as the rain clouds moved on. So ended our first full day in Paris. On the morrow we’d be heading for Falaise and then one of the seven wonders of the world — or it ought to be — the abbey at Mont St Michel.

 June 27, 2011

BOOK RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LIONHEART

For the first time, I listed a bibliography in Lionheart, not all of the books I consulted, of course, but those that I found most helpful.  I’ve been asked to provide it before Lionheart’s publication, and I am happy to do so.  Here is the part of my Acknowledgments Page that deals with book recommendations.    

 More and more of my readers have been asking me to include a bibliography for my novels.  I have begun listing some of my sources on my website and blog, but that doesn’t help those readers without internet access.  So I am going to cite here the cream of the crop, those books I found to be most helpful and most reliable.  The gold standard for Ricardian biographies remains John Gillingham’s Richard I, published in 1999 by the Yale University Press; he has also written Richard Coeur de Lion; Kingship, Chivalry, and War in the Twelfth Century.  The Reign of Richard Lionheart by Ralph Turner and Richard R. Heiser does not address the most consequential and fateful event of Richard’s life—the Third Crusade—but it does cover the remainder of his reign and has an excellent concluding chapter called “Richard in Retrospect,” which analyses the way his reputation has fluctuated over the centuries.  Kate Norgate’s Richard the Lionheart, published in 1924, has stood the test of time surprisingly well.  In all honesty, I have not read the second half of Frank McLynn’s Richard and John, Kings at War, but the half of the book about Richard is accurate and insightful.   I also recommend Richard Coeur de Lion in History and Muth, edited by Janet Nelson, The Legends of King Richard I Coeur de Lion, by Bradford Broughton, and The Plantagenet Empire, by Martin Aurell, translated by David Crouch.  

        My favorite book about Richard’s mother is Eleanor of Aquitaine, Lord and Lady, a notable collection of essays edited by Bonnie Wheeler.  There are a number of biographies written about Eleanor, more than Henry, which would probably not please him much.  Just to list a few of her biographers: Ralph Turner, Regine Peroud, Allison Weir, Regine Pernaud, Jean Flori, Douglas Boyd, D.D. R Owen,Marion Meade, and Amy Kelly, though the last two authors’ conclusions about the so-called Courts of Love are no longer accepted.  I also recommend The World of Eleanor of Aquitaine: Literature and Society in Southern France between the Eleventh and Thirteenth Centuries, edited by Marcus Bull and Catherine Leglu, and Eleanor of Aquitaine, Courtly Love, and the Troubadours, by Ffiona Swabey.

        I was blessed with a treasure-trove while researching and writing Lionheart—two chronicles written by men who’d accompanied Richard on crusade, and two by members of Salah al-Din’s inner circle.   I felt very fortunate to have access to Helen Nicholson’s translation of The Chronicle of the Third Crusade, the Itinerarium Peregrinorum et Gesta Regis Ricardi, and Marianne Ailes’s translation of The History of the Holy War; Ambroise’s Estoire de la Guerre Sainte; these wonderful books make fascinating reading and provide invaluable footnotes about the persons and places mentioned in the texts. Another crusader chronicle is The Conquest of Jerusalem and the Third Crusade, Sources in Translation, by Peter W. Edbury, and then there is Chronicles of the Crusades, edited by Elizabeth Hallam.  Baha al-Din ibn Shaddad wrote a compelling account of his time with Salah al-Din; in Lionheart, I quoted from the 19th century edition, Saladin or What Befell Sultan Yusuf, translated by the Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, but there is a more modern translation by D. S. Richards, complete with annotated notes, titled The Rare and Excellent History of Saladin.  Other contemporary chronicles are The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir for the Crusading Period, from al-Kamil fi’l-ta’rikh, Part 2, also translated by D.S. Richards, and a chronicle written by one of Salah al-Din’s scribes, Imad ad-Din al-Isfahani, translated into French by Henri Masse as Conquete de la Syrie et de la Palestaine par Saladin.  There is also Arab Historians of the Crusades, translated by Francesco Gabrieli. Non-crusading chronicles include The Chronicle of Richard of Devizes, translated by J.A. Giles, The History of William of Newburgh, translated by Joseph Stevenson, The Annals of Roger de Hoveden, translated by Henry T. Riley, and History of William Marshal, translated by S. Gregory and annotated by D. Crouch.

     Moving on to Sicily and Cyprus, there is The Travels of Ibn Jubayr, translated by Roland Broadhurst, a remarkable account of a pilgrimage to Mecca made by a Spanish Muslim in 1182-1183; his description of a deadly storm in the Straits of Messina was my inspiration for Alicia’s shipwreck in Chapter One of Lionheart.  The Kingdom in the Sun by John Julius Norwich is a beautifully written book about Norman Sicily, although his “take” on Richard is outdated.  Another outstanding book about Sicily is Admiral Eugenius of Sicily, his Life and Work and the Authorship of the Epistola ad Petrum and the Historia Hugonis Falcandi Siculi, by Evelyn Jamison; it is, however, almost as hard to find as the Holy Grail.  For the history of medieval Cyprus, readers need look no further than Peter Edbury’s The Kingdom of Cyprus and the Crusades, 1191-1374.

     The best book about the Crusades, IMHO, is Thomas Asbridge’s riveting The Crusades.  Other books on my list include God’s War, by Christopher Tyerman, Holy Warriors, a Modern History of the Crusades, by Jonathan Phillips, Fighting for the Cross, by Norman Housley, the six volume A History of the Crusades, edited by Kenneth Setton, and The Assassins, by Bernard Lewis.  The definitive study of Salah al-Din is still Saladin; the Politics of the Holy War, by Malcolm Cameron Lyons and D.E.P. Jackson.  I also recommend The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives, by Carole Hillenbrand.  Some social histories are The World of the Crusaders, by Joshua Prawer, The Crusaders in the Holy Land, by Meron Benvenisti, Medicine in the Crusades, by Piers D. Mitchell, and Daily Life in the Medieval Islamic World, by James E. Lindsay.  For books dealing with warfare during the Crusades, a classic study is Crusading Warfare, 1097-1193, by R.C. Smail; there is also David Nicolle’s two volume Crusader Warfare.

       Lastly, for books that cover medieval warfare in general, I have several exceptional books to recommend:  By Fire and Sword; Cruelty and Atrocity in Medieval Warfare, by Sean McGlynn, Noble Ideals and Bloody Realities; Warfare in the Middle Ages, edited by Niall Christie and Maya Yazigi, Western Warfare in the Ages of the Crusades, 1000-1300, by John France, Tolerance and Intolerance; Social Conflict in the Age of the Crusades, edited by Michael Gervers and James M. Powell, and War and Chivalry; the Conduct and Perception of War in England and Normandy, 1066-1217, by Matthew Strickland.  

ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE TOUR–OUR ARRIVAL

 

Well, I am finally on the mend after my bout with Angevinia, as Sherill, one of our tour group, named the ailment that struck so many of us down upon our return home. So I feel up to starting my tour reports — sadly, after the fact. But even if my netbook had let me log onto the internet as often as I’d wished, I wouldn’t have been able to manage daily bulletins — too much fun, friends, and wonderful French wine. My intentions were good; I just wasn’t being very realistic.

I thought I’d do a day at a time. Most of us arrived in Paris on Sunday, June 4th, though a few lucky souls got there earlier and Paula, one of our four Australians, was able to spend time in England and Wales beforehand. Once we checked into our hotel on the Left Bank, jet-lagged but excited, some of us went out for lunch, where we discussed — quelle surprise — books, with great enthusiasm. Several of us then wandered over to one of Paris’s best-known English language bookshops, Shakespeare and Company. The original Shakespeare and Company was a famous hangout in the 1920s for the “Lost Generation,” writers like Hemingway, Fitzgerald, and James Joyce. It was closed during the Nazi occupation of Paris, but later reopened at its current location, very close to the Seine and Notre Dame. The last time I was there, there was a very sleek and elegant black cat napping in the window, but he wasn’t around on this visit.

We had a very interesting and eclectic group — four from Australia, one of whom is now living in Viet Nam, one from Canada, one from England, and the rest from the US, with a large number of states represented — California, Oregon, Colorado, Texas, Illinois, Oklahoma, Nevada, Maryland, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, New York, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Ages ranged from Anna at 14 to those of a “certain age” like me, and it was skewed toward the female side, though the three men aboard were not complaining about that! We had a fascinating mix of professions, too — a doctor, two psychotherapists, a diver at Disneyworld, a librarian, a lawyer, several students, two midwives, two accountants, a pharmacist, an optometrist, and a cellist, just to name some of them off the top of my head. We had three mother-daughter combinations, which pleased me and made me a little sad that I’d never been able to take a trip like this with my own mother. And we had one family, Lisa and her two daughters and her sister Kathy. Lisa’s daughter Julia is the one who videotaped the tour for us, and did an outstanding job, always very unobtrusive, almost invisible at times. Best of all, we were a very congenial group, bonding easily and getting along very well; I am sure that a number of friendships were forged in those ten days. I know I feel as if I made 36 new friends.

That evening, we had our first official tour dinner, which was the only real misstep of the tour, for it was at a restaurant that was small and cramped and very, very noisy. I remember thinking that we’d need to shout to be heard — and then the musicians arrived. Imagine being trapped in an elevator with an exuberant accordion player and you get an idea of the acoustics. So we were soon being serenaded by such French classics as “I can’t get no satisfaction,” which a group of German tourists seemed to enjoy more than we did. John, our retired English doctor, who would later prove to be my guardian angel on the tour, performed an act of great chivalry and changed seats with Paula, who was seated in the line of fire, right next to the accordion player. I would rate that with Sir Walter Raleigh’s sacrifice of his cloak to keep Gloriana’s feet dry.

As I said, not an auspicious start to the tour. But when I talked to J.D., our tour guide, he explained that we were supposed to eat in a private room upstairs; the restaurant’s air conditioning had stopped working, though, and they’d had to put us downstairs. So it was not the fault of our tour planners, had to be written off as one of those inevitable minor mishaps that occur whenever people travel. I’m sure medieval pilgrims often found themselves staying at inns with leaky roofs or mice that wanted to get too up close and personal. All in all, I was quite impressed with the itinerary set out by Academic Travel and would highly recommend them in the future. We were very well looked after by J.D. and by Janus, our bus driver; wait till you read about our experience on a narrow bridge on the way to Fontevrault! Tomorrow I will start the tour in earnest, with our first day in Paris.

 PS  The photo is one of John’s — the Ile de la Cite, which was the beating heart of Paris in the MA.

 June 24, 2011

 

FOLLOWING IN ELEANOR’S FOOTSTEPS

This is not a real blog, just a reminder that I will be leaving today for the Eleanor of Aquitaine tour, and so if anyone has specific questions for me, please hold them till mid-June.   I’d hoped to blog about the tour, but my netbook, with typical computer contrariness, won’t let me log onto it.  I will definitely be able to post notes on Facebook, and I hope to be able to use my friend John’s iPad to do at least one blog while in France.  If not, I will do an extra long one when I get home.  I am sure that somewhere Eleanor is smiling, after having pointed out to Henry that no one has booked a tour to follow in his footsteps.
June 4, 2011

INTERVIEW WITH JOAN SZECHTMAN

This has been Ricardian month on my blog, as I recently interviewed Anne Easter Smith to discuss her new novel about Cecily Neville and today I am visited by Joan Szechtman, author of two novels about Richard III, This Time and Loyalty Binds Me.   I haven’t had a chance yet to read Loyalty Binds Me, mainly because of the upcoming Eleanor tour, but I did read This Time and enjoyed it.  The premise is very imaginative–snatching Richard from Bosworth Field at the moment before his death and transporting him to our time–and Joan executed it quite well.  She dealt with issues that would be bound to come up for a medieval man suddenly finding himself in our time, both the serious (religious intolerance) and the more mundane (cars, computers, etc.)    I found her Richard to be believable and likable and I am looking forward to continuing his journey in the 21st century.  I am sure he will find voice mail and never-ending political campaigns every bit as annoying as the rest of us do, but he also faces a unique challenge–having to prove he did not murder his nephews!   

Interview with SKP

 

SKP: Before we start, I hope you don’t mind if I ask you how you pronounce your name.

 

JS: Joan? Just the way it’s spelled—just kidding. 😉 Szechtman is easy if you pretend the “z” is an “h” and then pronounce it the way it’s spelled. All joking aside, I’m quite honored to be doing this interview. Thank you so much for giving me the opportunity.

 

SKP: I understand that Loyalty Binds Me is the second book in this series after This Time. Since this is your first interview with me, please tell us a little about both books.

 

JS: THIS TIME starts moments before Richard III loses to Henry Tudor on the field of Redemore near Leicester, England on August 22, 1485. In THIS TIME, a team of Ricardians substitutes an armor-clad corpse for the king and brings him into Portland, Oregon. Richard awakens August 21, 2004 to an alien world where even the English he speaks is different.

 

The story follows two parallel paths: the present where Richard must learn how to adjust to not only the technological advancements but also the more difficult cultural differences; and looking back at the past to solve some of the mysteries that have haunted and maligned his image for over 500 years.

 

The second book, LOYALTY BINDS ME, continues Richard III’s story. Richard has married a divorcee, adopted her two daughters, and with the help of his new wife, has been able to rescue his son Edward, who had predeceased him in the 15th-century. Richard has lived in the twenty-first century for two years, and his son has been with him for the past year. At the start of the novel, they have just arrived in London, when Richard is brought in by the Metropolitan Police for questioning about the alleged murder of Richard III’s nephews in 1483. Richard must now find a way to clear his name and protect his family while concealing his true identity.

 

The books are written to stand by themselves; there are no cliffhangers at the end of each novel and there’s enough information in the second book for a new reader to understand the story without boring those who have read the first book.

 

SKP: I usually don’t read fictional books about one of my characters, but I was so intrigued by your premise of bringing Richard III into the 21st century that I put aside my usual reservations. Why did you bring Richard III into the 21st-century?

 

JS: One of the things that really got to me about Richard III was that he was so young—only 32—when he died. I felt his story wasn’t finished and I wanted to examine his character in a modern light, without forcing our modern sensibilities onto his 15th-century actions. To do this, I had to let him speak for himself. Admittedly, I could have done something akin to Connie Willis’s Doomsday Book and send a protagonist back in time, but I thought that by bringing Richard into the present day, I could challenge him in ways that I couldn’t by writing a period piece. Additionally, I didn’t feel the need to tell Richard’s life story. You beat me to it. In fact, it was your book, Sunne in Splendour, which put me on the Ricardian path to the point where I felt compelled to write about Richard, but from a different perspective.

 

SKP: Many time-travel novels ignore language differences, but you didn’t. Yet, Richard was able to adjust rapidly to modern English.

 

JS: Richard was probably fluent in three or four languages, and although today’s English would have at first sounded foreign to him, I felt that there was enough similarities—based on my reading of The Paston Letters, for example—between Early Modern English and today’s English that he would have been able to understand a lot of what he heard fairly quickly. I also provided a linguist that was able to help him over the inevitable speed bumps.

 

SKP: Another rapid adjustment that Richard achieved was his ability to absorb and take advantage of today’s technology. It left me a bit breathless.

 

JS: There have been modern instances of individuals from isolated primitive cultures being brought to technologically advanced cultures. Most of these individuals were able to use the technology quickly. The more difficult adjustment has to do with cultural differences. Such was the case for Richard. Because he was intentionally brought into the future, and not by accident, he had access to people who could help him learn how to use such things as phones, computers, cars, etc.

 

I also decided to advance his adjustment so that I wouldn’t put the reader to sleep having him learn every single detail that we take for granted. So I tried to show him learn some things and let the reader imagine him learning the rest.

 

SKP: I understand that not only do you think that Richard did not kill his nephews, but that they may well have survived him.

 

JS: Yes. Despite the rumors the princes had met an evil end and Tudor’s willingness to parley these rumors to his advantage, extant documentation and contemporary reports show only that the boys disappeared. Setting aside the lack of documentation, I also took into consideration the behaviors of both Richard III and Henry VII. Then, it was standard operating procedure to display bodies to “prove” that their reigns were without credible challenge. Despite the way Henry had Richard’s body mistreated immediately after the battle, he nevertheless had it put on display to show that he was now the undisputed king. I have to think that if Henry had killed the princes or knew where their bodies were, he would have displayed them and blamed Richard for their deaths. If Richard had had them killed, he could have easily first blamed Welles for their deaths during the botched attempt to “free” them from the tower, and then later, Buckingham, when Richard had him executed for treason.

 

Richard had far less reason to want the princes dead than did Henry. Through “Titulus Regius” parliament declared Richard the rightful king and bastardized all of Edward IV’s children. As bastards, the princes could not inherit any title. Henry VII had his parliament revoke “Titulus Regius” which enabled his marriage to Edward IV’s oldest daughter, Elizabeth Woodville. If the princes were alive, they now had more claim to the crown now that their impediment had been removed. In fact, based on how he handled the man he called Perkin Warbeck, I think he was more than a little afraid that Warbeck was really Richard of York, the younger of Edward IV’s two sons. Interestingly, Warbeck claimed to have been in Edward Brampton’s household in Portugal. Now Brampton was a Portuguese Jew who converted soon after Edward IV first became king and served both Edward and Richard. Among the many awards that Richard gave Brampton, he knighted him in 1484—the first monarch to knight a converted Jew. As much as Richard may have liked the guy, I think there had to have been an extraordinary reason for him to grant Brampton knighthood. I think the reason was that Richard had entrusted Richard of York’s care to Brampton.

 

SKP: Now that you’ve “saved” Richard and brought him into our time, do you have any more books planned for him?

 

JS: There is a third book in the works with its own set of surprises. The working title is STRANGE TIMES. This one is partially about Francis Lovel—someone most Ricardians think was close to Richard’s heart.

 

SKP:  Francis was very close to my heart,too, while writing Sunne, for he was the only Francis in a book packed with Edwards, Richards, and Elizabeths.    It sounds very intriguing.   Thank you so much, Joan, for a most interesting interview about one of my favorite medieval kings.

  

May 23, 2010